According to the same IEA report, investment in coal, gas, and oil will rise to over $1 trillion in the same period – pouring even more fossil fuel pollution into the atmosphere. While paying lip service to climate protection, Washington has signed off on huge expansions of fossil fuel extraction on Federal lands in the Gulf and Alaska. And it is providing huge subsidies for new, so-far-failing technologies like carbon capture and hydrogen that may actually expand the burning of fossil fuels. The extent of the fossil fuel reductions we need has been laid out by climate scientists. Specific goals have been agreed to in the Paris Agreement. Targets and timetables for U.S. greenhouse gas reduction have been laid out by the Biden administration. How should we determine what means to use to reach those targets? The Labor Network for Sustainability is dedicated to developing strategies for climate protection for workers and their communities. We believe that the use of alternative technologies should be determined by scientific evaluation of their full costs and benefits for workers and society. Those include health, safety, environmental, employment, waste disposal, and other social costs and benefits while effectively meeting the targets and timetables necessary to protect the climate. Any technology should be used if and only if it provides a means of protecting the climate that is more beneficial to society than other means, such as renewable energy and energy efficiency. The following principles should guide the selection of strategies and technologies for climate protection: - The climate emergency requires an emergency response that reduces GHG emissions at a rate of 6 percent annually starting immediately. Any climate protection plan must include immediate implementation of such reductions.
- Any strategy must be based on scientific evaluation of means and likely effects.
- All impacts, including health, safety, environmental, employment, waste disposal, and other social costs and benefits, must be included in evaluation.
- Costs and benefits must be compared for different strategies and technologies.
- Employment benefits should be evaluated for contribution to creating good jobs for all.
These principles should be applied to all climate protection technologies, including renewable energy, energy efficiency, nuclear energy, carbon capture – and allegedly “clean” fossil fuels. For workers and communities being asked to back hazardous projects with unproven technologies, we offer this word of advice: Don’t be afraid to ask whether the programs you are being asked to support actually meet the criteria you need. |